Point of Departure

History and Theory

My Point of Departure

So after opening up with a couple of posts to set the agenda, as it were, let us try to organize a few guidelines.

1) Me being an ordained member of clergy, let me set this out right from the start; I enter the field as a firm believer in our God, a God humanity entered into a relation with in the region roughly resembling today’s Israel, some time around 1000-1500 years BCE.

2) The views expressed here, on this Blog, are mine. Others may have, and in most cases have, allowed it to be known that they are of the same or similar opinions, if so, I congratulate them. I do, however, want to stress the fact that what I put forth here is not what some may want to label ’truth’, not the only ’truth’, or even one of many ’truths’. What I put forth in these pages is my view. My opinion. My theorem. Some other theories might support my views, others may not. These are, nevertheless, mine. If you, the distinguished reader hereof, agree with what I state as my theory, good and well. If you disagree, so be it. 

3) My views differ on a number of critical points from that of the Vatican, as well as from Protestant churches’ dogma. I don’t disrespect those entities, I simply and humbly beg to differ from their opinions. If, when reading one of my posts, you think to yourself; ’Hello, that’s not true’, or something in line with that, then just refer back to this post, and what I state here as regards my theorem vs standpoints of others. 

Differing views

Some may think that the Merovingians were in fact not related to Mary Magdalene. Let me put it thusly; ’They were’. A common argument to counter my opinion is that the Merovingians are known only from a timeframe starting about 350 years after Mary Magdalene died. This is certainly the case. What is no less factual is of course that the tribe known as the Merovingians existed hundreds of years before they came to power and generated what came to be the France of today. They were then known as the Sicambrian Franks. In addition one must bear in mind that the Magdalene, interred in South France, Gave birth to children, fathered by Jesus the Christ, the Palestinian prince from the house of David. Some do not agree. Well, so be it. We are all entitled to our opinions, even though they may be wrong. My superior at my first workplace used to say to us junior researchers; ’You are of course wrong, but it is your right to be. Just go ahed…’ He was right. I was wrong, and it was my right to be. Also I had to pay the price for being wrong, starting over, doing twice the work. I believe those years taught me many things. Mainly that there are many ideas and theories, some true some not, and my job is to distinguish which is what.

 Starting from Truth

Yes. In order to treat this bit of history fairly, we start as has been established in previous posts, by establishing that the true Jesus, the prince of the house of David, was a human being. His physical father was Joseph, the husband of Mary. Joseph was a craftsman, not a carpenter, which is simply one of many mistranslations. He knew the secrets of Gold. Jesus, his son, was the rightful heir to the Palestinian crown, which is why the puppet king put in position by the romans saw him as a threat. Jesus was a well read man. He had studied in Alexandria, among other places. He was the Messiah, which at the time simply meant the anointed one. King David was also a Messiah, as was Solomon. The future king was anointed, which even the biblical story displays when Jesus is anointed by his wife to be, Mary Magdalene. The anointing of the feet is, furthermore, a traditional part of Jewish marriage at that time. If you are familiar with your bible, you will perhaps recall that Jesus was anointed by a ’sinful’ woman. This was decided by the early church, that the female disciple, and in fact the wife of Prince Jesus, was a sinful, fallen, woman. Jesus, the head of their church could not be married to anybody but the church as such, it was decided, therefore the woman was simply ’sinful’. The truth is that she was not at all sinful. She was Jesus beloved wife to be, the mother of his children. The vessel, or grail, of the ’SangReal’, the blood royal. 

One must bear in mind that Christianity as such, as we know it from subsequent times, is not what Jesus, the Davidic Prince, taught. No. The historical Jesus, did not see himself as the divine figure he was transformed into by first and foremost Paul, or Saul as he was known when he set out to propagate his own religion, not that of Jesus the Nazarene. Nazarene, interesting word. The less than reliable translations of the Bible through times propagated ideas about Jesus himself stemming from the little village of Nazareth. Well, he did not. Nazareth the village did not even exist by the times of Jesus. The manuscripts put forth Jesus, the Judaic prince, as being Nazarene, which was a local cult of Judaism. Think of it as something like what the Jehovahs witnesses is to christianity. Or the Anglican Church. Jesus himself would have washed his hands from what Paul preached. He never saw himself as the inventor of a new religion, as some other sources claim. He was a devout jew. The law was that of Moses. A Messiah was an anointed bearer of the Sang Real, the Sangraal, the Holy Royal bloodline. Paul invented a religion based on previous well known religions and patterns and stories, made with the purpose of being accepted by people of the time. To be accepted by the Roman Empire. Mithraism forms much of the patterns of ideas applied in creating the ’new’ religion. Mithras was born in a distant cave, provided with gifts by wise men. The idea of communion was also adopted from Mithraism. Eating the flesh and blood of Mithras was deemed necessary in order to be saved on the day of judgement. Sounds familiar? Osiris, Adonis, Zoroaster. Many are the historical figures lending traces to the new religion, of the plethora of actively worshipped Gods and divinities in the region, a number were allegedly born from a virgin and conceived by a God. The wound in Jesus side at the crucifixion; Tammuz is said to have died from a wound in his side, and as of pure coincidence resurrected after three days leaving his tomb empty with the cover stone rolled aside. Yes, the Pauline church fathers followed the script to perfection, after James, the brother of Jesus, and the Nazarenes, were taken out of the equation. But I digress. Let’s not get ahead of ourselves. The pauline transformation of the Judaic cult of Jesus the Nazarene happened some time after the death of Jesus, and prior to that, in acute connection to the crucifixion of Jesus the Prince of the house of David, and the bearer of the SanGraal, the holy blood, his wife, Mary from Magdala had to flee in order to save the bloodline which the Roman puppet king of Judea was searching to eradicate, as he saw it as a threat to his power and indeed to that of Rome.

This Mary from Magdala is the true Grail. The vessel of the royal, divine, blood. She is the one destined to bring the Holy blood forth to future man. When she traversed the mediterranean from Egypt to eventually reach Southern France and landed in the village now known as Les Saintes-Marie-de-la-Mer together with the mother of her husband, Mary, and Lazarus, the healed Leper, and St Maximin. The story is that they also brought Sarah, an Egyptian girl, as their maid. 

Mary gave birth to the offspring of her and Jesus, and the bloodline continued to live on in France, and a line of this then came to be wed into the Merovingian Clan in the region of present day Germany. The Merovingians entered what is now France, they can actually be seen as the founders of France. So the circle is completed, Mary Lay interred at La Sainte Baume convent, where she died, and her bloodline returns to France by way of the Merovingians, who were to rule France during hundreds of years while the empire grew in areal and importance. 

This is important. The bloodline is based in the predecessors to the Egyptian Pharaonic lines. We are starting out at a very early time in human history. Actually at times when kingship was known as ’kinship’, and the bloodline from the first royal clan spread out from the region of Egypt, and Mesopotamia, as well as towards today’s Israel. The knowledge of the secrets of Gold have continued to be provided to those of the Bloodline. 

The Pendragons

At the time of the Merovingians a new force emerged in England. Arthur the Pendragon. At that time, not only were the bloodline continued through the Merovingians, also, Jesus’ Brother James (Joseph) ventured to England and founded christianity on the Island. Ha Rama Theo (the title anglicized as ’of Arimathea’) and his wife Anna brought the Bloodline to those parts. The roots of Arthur can be traced all the way back to Ha Rama Theo and his wife Anna. Their daughter and carrier of the holy blood, also named Anna, begot Penardun and Beli, both fathered by Bran the Blessed (son of King Lear and Penardim). Now, Penardun, who was a protegee of queen Boudicca) mothered Coel I of Camulod. By way of Cunedd and a straight line ending up with Arthur Mac Aedan Ard Ri and Warlord. D 603, High King of Britons from 575. The Grail Bloodline running all the way from Joseph of Arimathea to the Briton Royal family. It will of course also be noted that the House del Acqs are in straight succession within the Sicambri lines under Pharamund and Princess Argotta of the Dagobert house. More on the Pendragons, the del Acqs’, and the court of Arthur in later installations of the blog.

Knights Templar

Within some hundred years after the downfall of the Merovingians a new group emerged, which was to gain in importance during its existence. We are of course talking of the Knights Templar. Here a name of quite some importance would be Godefroi de Bouillon (c. 1060 - 1100) who was commander of the first crusade, Duke of Lower Lorraine, and King of Jerusalem in 1099 for less than a year before his departure to the hereafter. De Bouillon descended in a straight line from the fisher kings and the Merovingians, and thusly from the Grail family. The same goes of course for Baldwin I, king of Jerusalem, died in 1118. Let us say for the sake of clarity, it was not a matter of chance that the carriers of the Holy Grail Bloodline were destined to save the holy city and kingdom of God for their master who was of course God. More on this to be developed in later installations.

There. That would suffice for the weekly installation, methinks. Lots to ponder and dive into for further studies. In a week we shall meet again, in which episode of the blog will be delved into the Pendragon trail, and, time allowing, the Scots Royal house of Stewart. Both major parts of the Holy Bloodline. Until then!